On The Nightstand – The Ghost Brigades – 1/18/2018

I was traveling yesterday and today – quick trip to Boston for work.  While it kept me from posting last night, it did give me a chance to finish Scalzi’s sequel to “Old Man’s War”.  “The Ghost Brigades” is the second of six books in this series with the next being “The Last Colony”.  There’s also a long short story or a short novella – not sure how it should be classified – called “The Sagan Diary”.

First things first – I’ve decided to go ahead and finally read through this series – now that I’ve started back in, I feel I should finally finish.  Unless something changes, however, this is the last single book post I’ll make for the series.  My impressions of “The Ghost Brigades” were similar to those I had of “Old Man’s War” and I don’t want to keep writing the same critical review over and over.

Before reading this, you might want to go back to my post on “Old Man’s War” since many of the criticisms will be similar.  There’s nothing remarkable about the Scalzi’s writing – it’s sparse and I didn’t find it complex or captivating.  I found the plot kind of clunky and many of the sentiments a little too cliche and overblown.  It doesn’t stand out as Military Science Fiction.  Finally, the characters were unremarkable and one dimensional.  I found the antagonist to be particularly silly and caricatured.  Overall, after reading two of these, I just cant’ escape the impression that Scalzi took a pretty interesting idea and just didn’t do it justice.  They’re not bad stories – just not as good as they should be.

As I started into this book, I’d initially felt like it might represent an improvement or evolution compared to “Old Man’s War” – a fact I commented on in my “All Systems Red” post.  That didn’t turn out to be the case.  In “Old Man’s War”, the Ghost Brigades are introduced as a mysterious, unique and extremely capable Special Forces component of the larger Colonial Defense Forces.  I’d expected Scalzi to take those hints and do something truly novel with them in the second book.  Scalzi’s concept for Ghost Brigades personnel is that they’re vat grown, hyper-augmented bodies that receive an artificially generated consciousness – soldiers purposefully designed to be equal to or superior to any of the numerous alien species challenging humans for a place in the universe.

This is a blank slate that could have been used to develop a supremely interesting concept – something vaguely human yet shockingly and awe-inspiringly different.  Instead, as the book progresses, these soldiers are humanized to an almost disappointing degree until they’re ultimately not that different from the regular Colonial Defense Forces personnel at the heart of “Old Man’s War”.  I’m sure that many don’t share my perspective on this but – to me – it just felt like a miss.  I kept asking myself why Scalzi developed the concept and then chose to do so little with it.

As I’ve said, they’re not bad books and I am going to finish the remaining four installments – if for no other reason than to get closure on the story.  I’ll continue to hope that something magical happens and I will post again once I’ve finished the series.  Given what I’ve read so far,  however, I wouldn’t recommend that anyone start down this road.  There are much better books out there.  Besides, you’ll probably get the chance to see this on NetFlix in the not too distant future.

Posted in On The Nightstand | Leave a comment

On The Nightstand – All Systems Red – 1/16/2018

Here’s the 4th and final book I read during our cruise and I have to say – it wasn’t in the plan.  I’d downloaded this one awhile ago – around the time it was released – and it’s just been sitting on my iPad – collecting digital dust.  I bought it for two reasons:  1) I’d read Martha Wells’ “The Death Of The Necromancer” (DOTN) way back in 1998 when it first came out and enjoyed it so much that I later bought a special release hardcover edition – it’s an exceptional story that everyone should read, and 2) the reviews for “All Systems Red” were pretty positive – 4.5 stars on Amazon and 4.1 on Goodreads.  For both reasons, I felt like I should buy it and give it a try.

Well – we were pretty far into the cruise, I’d just finished “Shadow Of The Scorpion” and I was kind of directionless.  I wasn’t ready to head back to Malaz and pick up “Midnight Tides”, I didn’t have anything that I was really compelled to read and there it was – looking kind of neglected.  I opened it up, thinking I’d read the first chapter and before I knew it – I was done.

This is one you can just fly through.  It’s simple – nothing complex about the science (what little of it there is) – no real world building given that the scientific survey team in question is stuck on an unexplored planet – the plot is very linear – and there’s very little back story.  The book is entertaining and I think most would enjoy it but I don’t get all the kudos and the rave reviews.  The main character – Murderbot – is not that complex – probably by design as it looks like the author intends to develop him across a series of novels.  You get a hint of a tragic past – a massacre he’d committed on a prior contract which leads him to refer to himself as Murderbot.  You never really get to know the supporting cast – the other members of the survey team – with the exception of the survey team leader – who does have a chance on several occasions to impact the story and define herself as an admirable character.  Like I said – it’s fun but it’s simple – science fiction cotton candy.

Murderbot’s one defining characteristic – other than that he very loyally serves the survey team he’s contracted to protect despite the fact that he’s hacked the security protocols which would mandate his doing so – is that he likes to watch the story era equivalent of daytime drama.  What struck me about that peculiarity is the author makes no effort to weave his weird binge-watching obsession into the story – it only gets used on one occasion where Murderbot passionately defends the integrity of one of his favorite fictional characters during an argument with another member of the survey team.  If felt to me like a lost opportunity.

For a novel that sometimes gets characterized as hard science fiction, I found it pretty science lite.  Murderbot is obviously a pretty complex creation, you get a hint that he’s one of multiple models of synthetic humanoid (military bots, pleasure bots) but you get no real insight into how or why he and the rest of his kind were created the way they were or who did the creating – again, something that the author probably intends to explore in later books.

Like I said – it’s fun and I think you’ll enjoy it but it’s simple.  I will buy the sequels – two have already been announced – “Artificial Condition (scheduled for release in May 2018) and “Rogue Protocol (scheduled for release in August 2018) – but I probably won’t buy them in hard cover – just e-copies – since “All Systems Red” just wasn’t good enough to justify the investment.  I’m also left scratching my head a bit – given the three month separation in release dates between volume 2 and 3 – it makes me feel like I’m being played by the author and publisher.  Having said all that, I’m open to a change of heart and will go into the next two volumes ready to be impressed.  I know Martha Wells is capable of doing it – “DOTN” was a truly amazing book.

And on that note – the best thing that came from reading this book was the realization that “DOTN” is actually one of five books set in the world of Ile-Rien – one stand-alone (as is DOTN) called “The Element Of Fire” and a trilogy consisting of “The Wizard Hunters”, “The Ships Of Air” and “The Gate Of Gods”.  If I’m going to spend time and money on Martha Wells, I think I’d rather go back and dig into Ile-Rien.  Once I’ve acquired and read them, I’ll let you know how they were.

Final thought – if you haven’t read anything by Martha Wells, start with DOTN – you will not be disappointed.

I’ll be off-line tomorrow and won’t be able to post but I should be able to finish Scalzi’s “Ghost Brigades”.  That should be worth an update as I’m finding it to be a better read than “Old Man’s War”.

Cheers

Posted in On The Nightstand | Leave a comment

On My Mind – Kick Off – 1/15/2018

As good as it feels to end the old year – for me – it feels every bit as good to begin a new one.  Business development organizations like mine live in 12 month cycles and January is always a unique time.  We’re looking out over 12 brand new months – a blank canvas – nothing but potential – everyone has the ability to turn those 12 months into a personal and professional victory.  As my Dad likes to say at the beginning of every baseball season, “Everyone’s a winner on Opening Day”.  I love that feeling and this time of year and it all starts with the Annual Kick Off meeting.

It’s a regular event with most of the organizations I’ve worked for in past and it’s hardwired into everyone’s expectations for the year – a known quantity in terms of content and activity.  This was only the second of it’s kind for our group and, in both cases, I’ve approached the day with a bit of trepidation – worried about whether we can deliver a meaningful event and hopeful about what we might be able to accomplish.

Our group of Business Development, Marketing, State & Payer Relations and Business Analytics professionals spent the last two days of last week together at a downtown hotel celebrating last year’s wins, getting to know each other better, aligning on strategy and objectives for the new year and having some fun.  I’ll find out how people felt about it over the course of the next two weeks but my sense is that we got the year off to a good start.  I saw people laughing, contributing, working hard, enjoying each other and getting ready for another 12 month marathon.  Everyone seemed to throw themselves into it – open to anything and everything, ready to make great use of the opportunity and determined to do the work necessary for a strong start to the New Year.  I was really proud of our Team and the spirit with which they approached the event.  It just reinforced my belief that this is the finest group I’ve ever had the privilege of serving.

As you can tell from the Logo, our theme was Enterprise – the need to work together, across boundaries, aligned and committed to make sure that everything we do over the course of the next twelve months advances the Mission.  For a Mission driven organization like ours, this is critical and has to be treated as a non-negotiable.  Unless we’re aligned and working together, we only limit the impact we might have and the good we might be able to accomplish.  Overall, our Enterprise team seems excited about what 2018 might mean for us and for those that we work so hard to benefit.

So many things to be thankful for in the wake of an event like this – here are just a few:

  • All the hard work done by the very small group responsible for delivering the event.  I’ve seen how big companies approach events like these – external vendor support, celebrity participation and so very much money.  We delivered a fairly elaborate event on a very lean budget, relying on our own talent and with all the planning and production work being done by a small core team – all of whom had full time, demanding day jobs.  It’s a testament to what people can accomplish when they believe in what they’re doing and are proud of the organization they serve.
  • The good spirit and humility of my peers, who were more than willing to throw themselves into the event, put pride aside and embrace the need to have some silly fun.  This is the most committed, principled, good-humored and down to earth leadership team I’ve ever known.
  • The full Team – our entire organization – who really do approach every task and every challenge as an opportunity to serve the Mission.  I’ve worked with many skilled, motivated and successful teams but never one so guided by priorities external to both themselves and to the organization for which they work.

For myself, I’m thankful every day – at this stage in my professional life – for the opportunity to serve a Mission-driven organization.  I’ve been handed many great opportunities and experienced profound professional growth over the course of the last 25 years with several amazing for profit companies and I’m grateful for every one of those years.  While the same can be said for my current role – it would be damning with faint praise to do so.  As my boss has jokingly stated on several occasions, “it’s gratifying to see that you’ve chosen to do something more meaningful with your talents”.  I couldn’t agree more.

 

Posted in On My Mind | Leave a comment

On The Nightstand – Old Man’s War – 1/14/2018

Anyone who read my post on “The Collapsing Empire” probably remembers that I found the book to be interesting but not outstanding – a tick above average.  I also talked a bit in that post about the less than detailed memories I had of reading John Scalzi’s first book – “Old Man”s War”.  It was quite some time ago but I remembered having really enjoyed the book.  Finally, I mentioned that I’d purchased all of the other books in this series but for reasons I couldn’t recall – hadn’t ever gotten around to reading them.

The act of reading and writing about “The Collapsing Empire” and the vague memories of “Old Man’s War” that surfaced as a result prompted me to go back to the shelf, pull the book and give it a second read.  It’s a very simple book – easy to read in a day or two – and I’m glad I did as it’s left me with a very different view of the book and the author.

First, the observations I made about “The Collapsing Empire” seem pretty transferable to “Old Man’s War”.  I found the characters a bit shallow and one dimensional.  I found the aliens to be simplistic and cartoonish.  The Boot Camp / Training section of the book now seems kind of silly – patterned after the boot camp scene in every war movie I’ve ever seen.  There were aspects to the scientific / technical / military / weaponry descriptions that just didn’t make sense to me.  It was the same type of average that I found in “The Collapsing Empire” – a book that was, in many ways, better written – without the awesome presence of a character like Kiva Lagos.  In fact, I found the main character in “Old Man’s War” – John Perry – to be boring even after he transitions into his new life.

Here’s an example of what was, for me, a weird disconnect.  At the beginning of the book, after visiting his wife’s grave, Perry makes a visit to the local Colonial Defense Forces (CDF) recruiting station.  It’s described as being located in a non-descript strip mall sandwiched between a tattoo parlor and a state authority liqour store.  As you progress through the book and you start to get perspective on the resources possessed by the CDF as well as the sophistication of the technology it commands, it’s hard to understand why they’d put a recruiting station in that kind of location.  Actually, it’s kind of hard to understand why they’d need a recruiting station at all.  Everything done in that scene looks to me like something that could, should and would be done online.  Those types of non-sequiturs persist throughout the book.  It’s like Scalzi started with an interesting high level concept – enlisting seniors and rejuvenating them in return for military service – but wasn’t able to place it within a fully realized, future world.

The book wasn’t a waste of time – it’s entertaining and I’m glad I reread it.  It also hasn’t dissuaded me from starting the 2nd book in the series – “The Ghost Brigades”.  I do find the concept interesting and I want to see where Scalzi takes it all but I’m not going to give it that much time.  Unless things change, I can skim these and get what I need from them.  Once I’m done, I’ll let you know where I land.

Posted in On The Nightstand | Leave a comment

On My Mind – The Opera – Turandot – 1/14/2018

Here’s one for the “Don’t Stop Trying New Things”category.  I’ve spent years telling myself that Opera just wasn’t for me – not something I could possibly enjoy.  This post is all about realizing just how silly I’ve been.

Here’s the back story – as I was thinking about Christmas gifts for my wife this year, I decided to do something a little different.  We’re both at an age where we really don’t need much more stuff – what we want, we already have and anything more – particularly if it comes just to satisfy an expectation around gift-giving – starts to feel a bit wasteful.  As a result, I tried to focus not on stuff we might want – a challenge – but on things we haven’t done.  Here’s what immediately came to mind.  We live in a city with one of the leading Opera companies in the country.  Not only haven’t we made the effort to see the Lyric Opera of Chicago – neither of us has ever seen an opera performed.  It made for a pretty easy decision – I bought tickets for us to see the Lyric Opera perform Turandot and we went last night.

Long to short – we had a really great time for a whole host of reasons.  We made a night of it – great meal in the city at Lloyd’s followed by a pretty spectacular performance.  I will say that things started out rough.  I suggested that we drive into town instead of taking the train.  My thought was that I didn’t really want to feel rushed trying to accommodate the Metra schedule.  In retrospect, it wasn’t my best call – probably should have taken the train.  We didn’t have trouble getting into town but things went south very quickly as we were trying to find the parking garage recommended by the restaurant.  They gave us directions to a garage with an entrance off of lower Wacker.

This won’t be meaningful to anyone but Chicago suburbanites who only occasionally drive into the city but – at least from my perspective – the person who designed the whole Wacker / Lower Wacker / Lower Lower Wacker monstrosity should flogged in public.  We got hopelessly lost, drove around the city trying to follow those directions – at one point we had maps up on both smartphones, the restaurant on the line, flailing around in the car, trying not to let our frustration get the best of us.  We finally gave up and headed back to street level and found a convenient parking garage.  All good except for the fact that we walked into the restaurant 30 minutes late for our reservation – apprehensive about the chance that we might not make the performance.

To the credit of the staff at Lloyd’s, we obviously weren’t the first group of hapless visitors who tried this and failed.  They got us seated immediately, addressed all anxieties, served up a very nice dinner which included both a drink beforehand and dessert afterward AND made sure we got out with plenty of time to spare.  Kudos to our waiter who managed to make it all fun from beginning to end.

It just got better from there and here are several of the things I learned:

  • I tend to dive deep with anything I’m working on – detail is important to me.  I’d always assumed that the language barrier associated with Opera would keep me from enjoying the experience.  Nothing could have been further from the truth.  I did take a little time before we went to understand the story we’d be seeing.  In retrospect, that should be more than enough for anyone.  I could have watched the entire performance, not understood a single word and still both followed the story and appreciated the performance.  In fact, the translation provided on the monitor above the stage quickly starts to become superfluous – you stop paying attention since what’s happening on the stage becomes pretty compelling – pretty quickly.  The performance commands your attention and takes you away.
  • Turandot is a perfect choice for first timers.  It lasts a little over two hours and the story is fairly straightforward.  The costumes and sets are exotic, colorful, elaborate and visually rich – always holding your attention.  This being my first time, I don’t know how much of this was unique to the Lyric Opera’s performance but there were fun moments throughout the performance that added a quick chuckle – like the Emperor’s extremely long beard cascading off the elevated stage where he always appeared.  It was a near perfect first experience.
  • I really love watching people who are exceptionally good at what they do.  It could be as basic as watching a really good landscaping crew transform a garden to watching a skilled artist or craftsman create.  I even enjoy watching top tier e-athletes compete.  There’s something really compelling to me about watching exceptionally skilled individuals put those skills to work.  I challenge anyone to see an Opera without being blown away by the unique and exceptional and hard won nature of the skills on display.  First just watching and listening – then doing a little reading afterwards about what it takes to get to that level – I came away with a pretty profound respect for the people I’d seen perform.  In a world where anyone with a computer and a webcam and a bit of wit can become an internet celebrity, it’s really refreshing and reassuring to see a group of people do something this difficult and do it flawlessly.  It’s pretty awe-inspiring.

Overall, it was a great night and I cannot tell you why it’s taken me so long to give this a try.  It really was just silly and lazy and narrow-minded and a little curmudgeonly of me.  The whole thing helped me remember, particularly at my age, that I need to keep challenging myself and continuing to try new things.  If I needed any help remembering that, all it really took was the smile on my wife’s face when the lights came up for admission.  That was perfect.

PS:  I also bought tickets for us to see the Joffrey peform “A Midsummer Night’s Dream” in March and I’m really looking forward to the Ballet.

PPS:  The Civic Opera House alone is worth the visit – it’s impressive.

Posted in On My Mind | Leave a comment

On The Nightstand – Shadow Of The Scorpion – 1/9/2018

Here’s the third book I finished during the cruise – the second in internal chronological order in Neal Asher’s Polity series.  This is a pretty massive body of work – 15 books with the 16th coming this year.  I decided late last year to dive into this because I’ve been intrigued by the most recent trilogy in the series – “Dark Intelligence”, “War Factory” and “Infinity Engine” – but figured I should go back and start from the beginning – experience the universe as Asher has evolved it.  The first book – “Prador Moon” – was good enough to keep me going so I took “Shadow of the Scorpion” along on the trip.

I mentioned in yesterday’s post that books and series capture my attention for a whole host of reasons.  In “Collapsing Empire”, it was all about one really entertaining, larger than life character.  With this book, it was very different.  I actually found the central character a bit one-dimensional and the narrative kind of choppy.  I mentioned in an earlier post that I also found the same to be true for “Prador Moon” – the first book in the series – but wrote it off to the fact that it was a very early work .

*Quick correction – I mistakenly assumed that “Prador Moon” was an early work – it’s actually a prequel that Asher went back and wrote sometime around the midpoint of his career – same goes for this book.

In that respect, I’m two for two with Asher and multiple impressions along these lines would normally prompt me to move on to other things.  Having said that, what I enjoyed about “Prador Moon” was the universe Asher created and that held true for “Shadow of the Scorpion”.

Asher’s universe is one ruled / managed by benevolent AIs who, instead of deciding to eliminate their troublesome human creators, have decided to co-exist in a peaceful, constructive and symbiotic manner.  The AIs and the merged society they’ve established are what have really intrigued and entertained me with both of these books.  There are utopian aspects to the Polity that I can’t help but find encouraging and attractive.  The AIs also make for pretty interesting characters.  In these books, I find the Golems – AI subminds resident in ambulatory, humaniod constructs – to be far more interesting than the humans they work with and mentor.  They tend to be wise, kindly, self-sacrificing coaches to their messy biological partners.

I’m also glad I started into the novels when I did – given the public debate currently underway regarding artificial intelligence and the ramifications it has for the future of our race.  It’s hard not to feel some concern – with luminaries like Stephen Hawking and Elon Musk speaking out about the existential threat posed by the technology.  As unconnected to any current reality as these books are, it’s nevertheless interesting to see someone describe the possibility of a more positive outcome.

So…while the first two books of the series haven’t actually blown me away – there’s enough here to hold my interest – enough to prompt me to purchase the third book in the series – “Gridlinked”.  I’ll tackle it as soon as it arrives.

PS:  One final comment related to last night’s post on “The Collapsing Empire”.  Writing the post actually prompted me to pull “Old Man’s War” off the shelf and give it a second read.  I plowed through about a quarter of the book and I’m really enjoying it – enough so that I’ll try to finally finish up all six books in the series.  I’ll post something as soon as I’m done.

PPS:  I’ll be offline until Friday – hope to post again on Saturday – should have plenty to write about.

Cheers

Posted in On The Nightstand | Leave a comment

On The Nightstand – The Collapsing Empire – 1/8/2018

Here’s the second book I finished during the cruise – “The Collapsing Empire – first book in the newest series by John Scalzi.  Like most readers, the first Scalzi book I read was “Old Man’s War”.  I read it when it first came out way back in 2005 and – while I don’t remember the details – I do remember that I really enjoyed the book.  It’s attraction grew out of a novel premise – which I’m not going to describe – and Scalzi went on to build a 6 book series around the original release.

The rights to the first story were bought by Paramount and there were plans to turn it into a movie that was never made.  Rights were then picked up by the SyFy Channel with the intention of turning it into a TV series – another plan that never came to fruition.  In December of last year, the rights were acquired by NetFlix and I believe their intention is to turn it into a 2 hour movie.  I’m very hopeful that it’ll finally make it to the screen this time – even if just the small screen – I remember the book being that good.

One quick confession here – I never finished the remaining five books of the Old Man’s War series.  Along with “Old Man’s War”, I’ve purchased them all in hard cover:

  • The Ghost Brigades
  • The Last Colony
  • Zoe’s Tale
  • The Human Division
  • The End of All Things

Unfortunately, I never made it back to the series.  They’re still sitting on my shelf – waiting for the day when I have the chance to dig back into what was a pretty fascinating character and universe.

That’s relevant because when “The Collapsing Universe” was released last year, I saw it and decided I really should give Scalzi a second try.  As I sometimes accidentally do, I double bought and now have two copies – which means I’ll eventually be writing an “In The Cart” post on that second copy.  I also downloaded an e-copy so that I could take it on my trip.  It was a quick and easy read and – while I didn’t enjoy it as much as I remember enjoying “Old Man’s War” – I was glad I gave it the time.

I enjoy Fantasy and Science Fiction novels for many reasons.  Sometimes it’s just an amazing, totally immersive experience that does everything right.  “Dune” falls into this category – a book I’ve read many, many times.  Most don’t reach that level but still manage to grab me.  Sometimes it’s because of a compelling culture or universe – a topic for tomorrow’s post.  Sometimes it’s because of one compelling character that carries the entire book.  For me, “The Collapsing Empire” falls into that second category.  The concept, the plot, the universe in which the story takes place and most of the characters are all good and interesting enough but they aren’t compelling and they aren’t particularly memorable.  The exception in this book is Kiva Lagos – the one aspect of the book that goes waaaaay beyond better than average.  She’s a foul mouthed, amoral, incredibly capable, couldn’t give a s**t, overwhelmingly alpha female character who stumbles her way into being on the side of the angels.  My only regret about the book is that there wasn’t enough of her in it.  I don’t know what else to say – except that Kiva will be enough to keep me buying these books for as long as Scalzi continues to write them.  You’ll likely buy the first book because you like Scalzi.  You’ll buy the second book in the series – when it eventually comes out – because you LOVE Kiva.

One final note – reading the book was enough to convince me to go back and finish up the Old Man’s War series.  I’ll be moving all the books in the series – including the first – “Old Man’s War – out of my “On The Shelf” category and into my “On The Nightstand” category this year.  I think it’s finally time to tie up this loose end – particularly since it may be popping up in the not too distant future on NetFlix and I don’t want to tie my hands here in the same way I’ve tied them with Game of Thrones.

Cheers

Posted in On The Nightstand | 2 Comments

On The Nightstand – Fire And Fury – Epilogue – 1/7/2018

I finished this one tonight and thought I’d try to get some thoughts down before calling it a night.  Not sure whether or not this is a good call.  Given the nature of the book, a wiser course may have been to just sleep on it and write tomorrow night.  I’ll make the call once I’m done and before I push the “Publish” button.

First Observation:  I mentioned in my first post on the book that I felt compelled to read it as soon as possible due to all the attention it was receiving in the media.  I couldn’t help but think, as I was reading through the book, that the media was just missing the point.  In their coverage, they’ve focused on the juicy bits – Bannon’s quotes regarding the meeting at Trump Tower with the Russians or questions raised by the book regarding the President’s fitness.  The real story here is the shockingly dysfunctional relationships between three competing White House power centers – Bannon and his devotees, the Family consisting of Jared, Ivanka and their Goldman allies (Cohn and Powell) – and Priebus and his Republican mainstream colleagues (although this third group earns far less attention than the first two).  The author spends almost all of his time on the destructive competition between these three groups.  I know that all administrations have to deal with these types of internal struggles but the situation of almost open warfare described by the author seem far less civilized and far more amateurish than those we’ve seen in other administrations.  This no doubt goes to the character – or lack thereof – of those involved as well as the President’s lack of interest in establishing any control over those serving him.  We’d all be better served by coverage that spends more time on this dynamic.

Second Observation:  This book isn’t about the President.  It’s primarily about Steve Bannon.  He’s at the center of almost everything that happens over the course of the six month period covered in the book and it ends with his firing.  While the President is always a presence, he usually comes into focus when the author is relating public events about which we’re already well aware.  The two times in the book where the President becomes a truly central figure are the two events that will likely become the focus of any future obstruction of justice charges – the firing of James Comey and the drafting of the first statement describing the meeting between Don Jr., Manafort and Jared Kushner with the Russian delegation in Trump tower.  Most of the rest of the book focuses on Bannon, his role within the White House, his competition over the course of six months with Jared, Ivanka and the Goldman crew and his fight to impose his priorities and philosophies on the Administration.  The Family faction, while they get plenty of attention, are described in a slightly dismissive way and are, in my opinion, used primarily as foils for Bannon and his agitation.  It’s pretty obvious that Wolff finds Bannon to be a fascinating individual – almost distastefully endearing.

Third Observation:  Bannon is fascinating.  As Wolff has laid it out, Bannon is the only player in this White House that actually had a vision for what he wanted to accomplish and he was both incredibly determined and consistently unscrupulous in his attempts to advance that vision.  Interestingly enough, he’s the only character in the book that doesn’t have the pall of Russia hanging over him.  He also comes off – as described by Wolff – as the most thoughtful and strategic member of this weird team.  Both facts tend to make him more interesting than every other actor in the book – with the exception of the shadow of the President that hangs over most the activity described.  When you combine all of that with some of the quotes attributed to Bannon – one in particular being the conversation he had with the President about why it had been stupid for him to declare personal finances as a “red line” for the Special Prosecuter – a couple of pages which had me laughing out loud – he carries this book.  He’s easy to dislike but he’s impossible to ignore.

Fourth Observation:  Wolff does not make an overt case for the President’s lack of fitness for the role – a topic that the media has focused on relentlessly over the course of the last few days.  It’s not hard to come to that conclusion as you read through the book but Wolff never explicitly makes that case.  He comments at length on personal characteristics that serve the President very poorly as Chief Executive but he doesn’t speculate on his mental health or make a case for ending his tenure.  As I read the book, what struck me most powerfully about the President was his weakness as a Manager.  Anyone who’s successfully led an organization of any reasonable size knows that several things have to happen: 1) clear priorities have to be identified, 2) roles and responsibilities have to be clearly defined, 3) power has to be delegated based on mutually agreed to boundaries, 4) expectations and accountability has to be established and 5) progress has to be monitored on a regular basis.  None of this is rocket science, it’s all learned fairly early in any journey up the management track in any career and any Manager who doesn’t do these things will fail.  None of this happened in the first six months of this administration.  When you combine that absence of structure with the particular personality of this President, the results should surprise no one.  It leaves me wondering what the first six months of this Administration would have looked like if Kelly had been chosen as Chief Of Staff out of the gate.  The President obviously displays a number of troublesome personality traits that hamper his effectiveness but it’s possible for flawed leaders to be saved by strong Staffs.  It wouldn’t have prevented all of the outrageous outcomes we’ve seen but it may have mitigated the chaos to a measurable extent.

Overall, you can’t read this book without experiencing a sinking feeling.  Put all of the discussion about verification / accuracy of some of the more salacious quotes aside, you can’t escape the conclusion that this represents a relatively accurate description of the chaos, foolishness and stupidity that has so visibly characterized the first year of this administration.  The best thing you can say about the people at the center of the narrative is that they were all rank amateurs – including and most prominently the President.  Long to short – experience matters and we all got what we paid for.

I am going to publish this tonight but I’ll come back and reread it tomorrow to see if it holds up or if there’s more to say.  If you have time, I hope you’ll check in again to see if I’ve made any revisions.

Posted in On The Nightstand | Leave a comment

On My Mind – Fire And Fury – 1/6/2018

 

I called an audible yesterday – I decided as I was driving home from work that I really needed to read “Fire And Fury”.  I have an hour long commute and I’m in the habit of listening to CNN on SiriusXM during the drive.  Short to long – the book is receiving so much attention right now that I felt like I’d be remiss if I didn’t give it a look.  This is one I won’t buy in hard copy – I don’t think it’ll have much lasting value – no matter what happens with this administration, the book’s relevance will almost surely fade and I doubt anyone will remember it in a few years.  Nevertheless, it has real relevance at this moment in time so I’m going to put “Midnight Tides” down for awhile.  I ordered an e-copy last night and started into it.

This is going to be a challenging post for me because it’s really difficult to find steady, balanced middle ground in any conversation related to our current political and national situation.  I’ve never been one to live too far out on either extreme.  I’m an archetypal political middle of the roader.  I’m permissive and liberal in my Social views, I’m noticeably conservative when it comes to National Security issues and I try to be very balanced when it comes to economic issues.  I’m a committed independent – having voted Democrat twice and Republican twice in the last four Presidential elections.  That type of profile tends to be both liberating and challenging.  It also leads me – at times like this – to take positions that all too often fail to satisfy anyone.  With that caveat, I’ll try to get some impressions down based on what I’ve observed and what I’ve read so far.

I want to start with a disclaimer.  I’m uncomfortable with the current Administration and with the man who leads it.  My greatest concerns in this respect have to do with the following:

  • I’m extremely worried about the environment and the impact that human actions are having on climate and the sustainability of our planet’s environment.  If I could change one personnel decision made by this President, it would probably be his appointment of Scott Pruitt as Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (Ryan Zinke represents a close second).  I have a great deal of faith in this country, the principles upon which it was founded and the governmental institutions we’ve put in place over time.  They have, over time, led to good governance and balanced policy.  That just doesn’t hold true for the decisions being made at EPA and Interior right now.  They involve what I see as long term, existential issues.  I am profoundly uncomfortable with a political philosophy which prioritizes short term economic growth and the interests of the private sector over the long term interests of the planet and the human race as a whole.  There’s an important discussion related to balance here but this Administration has pushed us too far in a dangerous direction.  The consequences of constraining economic growth are manageable.  The consequences of irreversible environmental damage and climate change are not.
  • As a former Diplomat, I am extremely concerned about the decisions and messaging from the Administration which are, in my opinion, degrading the stature of this country internationally, weakening our traditional alliances and partnerships, diminishing our position of trust within the international community, destroying our ability to serve as an honest broker and our reducing our capacity to wield soft power.  While there are capable people serving in senior National Security positions (Mattis, McMaster, Tillerson, Kelly) within the Administration who understand the importance of these things and are, I believe, trying to preserve the stature and position we’ve carved out in the world since the end of the Second World War, I can’t help but believe that they’re losing this battle.  The current President seems to be so transactional, so focused on the use of hard power as a solution for everything and so unaware of both the complexity of the situations he faces and the negative consequences of the decisions he makes, that he’s already left us considerably diminished and isolated as a global player.  His approach may, at times, lead to what he and many see as short term wins but I’m convinced that the long term negative impact on our reputation, our influence and the international good will upon which we’ve normally been able to rely will be catastrophic.  The United States has been able to exercise global leadership for almost 70 years, despite our possession of military power that would normally make us a universally threatening presence on the global stage, due primarily to a relatively solid conviction among both our partners and our adversaries in our good intentions and our understanding of the need for restraint in the exercise of power.  I worry that this conviction, outside of the United States, is rapidly disappearing and we will all suffer the consequences of that change over the course of the next several decades.
  • I’m profoundly uncomfortable with the impact that the Administration’s actions and messaging are having on what I consider to be critically important public principles and institutions.  While it’s never been seamless, since the end of the J. Edgar Hoover era, there has always been a principled effort, on both sides of the administrative divide, to maintain a firewall of independence between the White House, and the Justice Department (and the FBI).  It’s one of those traditions / extra-legal principles that distinguish us from so many other countries and that give me comfort with respect to the preservation of our constitutionally guaranteed rights.  This President does not seem to understand the importance of that principle and is willing to degrade both the institution(s) as well as the firewall that protects us all from politically directed utilization of law enforcement capabilities.  To me, that is particularly frightening.  I’m also extremely uncomfortable with the degree to which this President and his allies are willing to denigrate the country’s journalistic institutions.  I’d be the first to note the frustrations I have with the profession of journalism as it’s currently practiced in this country.  Our 24 Hour news services are a travesty – all of them – Fox, CNN, MSNBC – which no longer really deliver fact based reporting.  I do make it a point to read both the Washington Post and the New York Times every morning and, while I do recognize the bias in their reporting, I feel more comfortable with their content based on the guidelines they both use in order to corroborate that content and the thresholds they’ve put in place to prevent inaccurate reporting.  Even given the imperfect nature of the profession, however, I see it as essential to the health of the country and one of the many components of our public life that differentiate and distinguish us.  This President simply does not seem to place any value whatsoever on the principle of an independent and free press.  He’s willing to exploit the credibility issues that already exist regarding the profession and amplify them.  In doing so, it only further weakens an institution that protects us all from the arbitrary application of governmental power and / or limits our access to information designed to shed light governmental excess or incompetence.
  • I’m particularly concerned about the way this President has reframed the discussion in this country around race.  I don’t know whether he’s racist or if he has prejudices that influence his words and actions – there is a difference and it’s not possible to know with any certainty – but he does project intolerant sentiments of race into our public discourse in a way that is both frightening and counterproductive.  The United States is a diverse and multi-cultural country and it will only become more so over time.  We’ve worked hard as a country to prioritize tolerance and to make this one of our foundational strengths – the Constitution demands that we do so.  The President’s words and actions, on all too many occasions, stand in stark contrast to this national commitment and this Constitutional mandate.  That weakens us and no good can come of it.

Having said all that, I’ll also say that the book doesn’t provide me with any sense of satisfaction.  We all suffer, potentially in a catastrophic way, when a President fails or when he proves to be unsuited to responsibilities we ask him to assume.  I do feel this President is failing us all but I don’t hate him for it and I don’t think he’s evil – a sentiment I find to be all too common in the country today.  I simply see him as dramatically and tragically unsuited to the role he’s been elected to fill.  He is what he is and all of us – collectively – chose him.  As I’ve read through the first third of this book, all its really done is strengthen my impression that he’s simply unsuited and he’s likely not going to be able to rise to the challenge.  He’s just not built to do the job and we’re all going to have to pay a price for a collective bad choice.

I will also say that I believe there to be a bunch of sludge in this book – I put it on the same level as a gossip columnist publication that has as it’s primary goal to leave everyone looking like a fool.  Based on what I’ve read so far, the author has accomplished his objective.  Nevertheless, if even a quarter of the content is valid – we all have a great deal to be worried about.

That’s my impression so far.  I’ll come back and post once I’ve finished the darn thing.

Posted in On My Mind | Leave a comment

On The Nightstand – Kill City Blues – 1/4/2018

 

This was the first book I finished during my trip – mentioned in my Holiday Reading Post on 12/11/2018.  I’ve also posted on “Devil Said Bang” – the fourth novel in the series.  “Kill City Blues” is the fifth novel in the series, published in 2013, and it’s every bit as fun as the first four.  As I go deeper into the series, though, I find that a few things are starting to come into focus.

I can’t escape the feeling that, in so many ways, the books are kind of a hot mess.  The Cosmos in which they’re set and the whole origin story has a pretty random feel – like the author is just throwing things against the wall – hoping that something will stick.

It starts simple in the first book – Heaven, Hell, Angels, Demons, God and Satan – but things start to swerve all over the place as you progress into the series.  You go from a pretty simple and relatively tight premise in the first book to a second book that feels like a couple of stories crammed together.  It winds up focusing on a Zombie Apocalypse in LA.  I don’t think it’ll spoil anything to reveal that the main character saves the city from flesh eaters but the third book starts in an LA where everything is back to normal – after the city was, for all intents and purposes, burned to the ground.  The whole thing requires you just to push on and not obsess over the disconnects.

Same thing with the subsequent books – it feels like the author is just banging along, mashing together multiple stories, not really worried about connection or continuity but having a great time as he writes.

Here’s the thing though – mentioned more or less in my post on “Devil Said Bang” – while that would normally annoy me and lead me to dismiss the whole series as poorly conceived – it doesn’t really bother me with these books.  You read them because they’re funny.  The main character – Sandman Slim – is an arrogant, anti-social, violent, one man wrecking crew oblivious to the damage he causes everywhere he goes.

He’s also ironic and witty and obnoxious and hugely entertaining.  My wife can always tell when I’m reading one of these books because I wind up laughing out loud – literally – every few pages.  The Cosmos and the plots may not be tight but the dialogue is – crisp and cutting and hilarious.  The interactions between the characters and the absolute disregard that Slim and his band of weird brothers have for almost every social convention is both disorienting and oddly endearing.

That’s been more than enough to keep me interested and connected through the first four books and “Kill City Blues” was no different.  It was fun in a cringe-worthy sort of way – kind of like the mixture of horror and humor you feel watching the scene in “A Christmas Story” where the kid freezes his tongue to the flagpole.

Having said that – I worry a little – sitting at the halfway point in the series – whether this will be enough or whether the whole shtick will start to lose it’s bizarre charm.  I’ll get back to Book Six – “The Getaway God” – as soon as I finish “Midnight Tides” and let you know.  In the meantime, definitely worth the time.

Posted in On The Nightstand | Leave a comment