On My Mind – Making Progress – 4/21/2018

I occasionally step away from my books and book reviews to write on subjects related to my work.  This is one of those posts and I hope my regular readers will be patient with me as I put up a brief post about something that brings me a great deal of satisfaction.

For almost 3 years now, I’ve had the privilege of leading a full spectrum Customer Engagement Division at an amazing Mission Driven organization.  That Division consists of Business Development, Enterprise Marketing, Business Operations and State and Payer Relations.  Our goal as an organization has always been to build a set of capabilities and processes that rival those I came to know in the larger, more richly resourced companies I’d served for over 25 years.

I’m very happy to say that our Enterprise Marketing organization was recently selected by Gartner / The Corporate Executive Board (C.E.B) as the subject of a case study to be made available available to their Marketing Leadership Council overviewing our transformation to a programmatic marketing approach.  Our Enterprise Marketing Leader will also be featured on a webinar open to C.E.B. members discussing this transformation next week on April 24.

In selecting our Marketing organization as the subject of this case study, we were encouraged to hear from Gartner / C.E.B. that they weren’t aware of any other organization with under $1B in revenue, much less a non-profit, that was running these types of programmatic media campaigns.  This stands out as a tangible milestone in that journey towards best practice and excellence and I can’t be more proud of my Enterprise Marketing Leader and his amazing Team for bringing us so far in such a short period of time.

Well Done Folks!

Posted in On My Mind | Leave a comment

On My Mind – In Memoriam – April 17, 2018

This is one of those days when I hope we can all pause for a moment to both remember and give thanks for an amazing individual.  Barbara Bush was laid to rest today in Houston, TX.  Over the course of her long and truly impressive life, she served as the Second Lady, the First Lady and the First Mother of the United States.  She’s only the second woman in history to claim that unique string of distinctions – her only peer being Abigail Adams.

For all the time we’ve been privileged to know her – even if only from a distance – she’s served as a near perfect representative of decency, respect, devotion, kindness, consideration and common sense.  By all measures and accounts, despite having lived at the center of wealth and power for decades, she never lost her common touch, her sense of humor, her practicality and her humanity.  I can’t help but think – as I drag myself through the newspapers every morning, as I wade through the dross that fills up the internet and as I watch in my daily life how poorly we often treat each other – the lack of civility and mutual respect that permeates our civil discourse – the death of community and connection and courtesy at the hands of unbridled individuality – that we are all lessened by her passing.  As a nation, I feel that we’ve been blessed to have her and I – for one – will truly miss her.

I think it’s also worth noting that reading was one of her lifelong passions and that she committed herself for many, many years to the cause of promoting literacy in our country.  She worked to bring attention to the connection between poverty and homelessness and illiteracy.  During her time as First Lady, her most public cause was family literacy.  After leaving the White House, she supported the development of the Barbara Bush Foundation for Family Literacy – which she chaired until 2012.  As someone who is passionate about books and reading, if nothing else were true of Barbara Bush, I’d value her for this alone.

With Deepest Regard and Respect!

Posted in On My Mind | Leave a comment

On The Nightstand – Across The Nightingale Floor – 4/21/2018

“Mon zen no kozō narawanu kyō wo yomu.”

It’s a Japanese saying that translates roughly to “An Apprentice Near A Temple Will Recite Scriptures Untaught” and it suggests that a person can learn and grow simply by being in the right environment and surrounded by the right people.  This one resonates with me and I can see its truth when I think back to the time I spent in Japan.  I had two opportunities to live and work in Japan for a total of 7 years and both were important learning and growth experiences for me.  I’ve met many Americans who fell in love with Japan and saw the country, its people and it’s culture as more meritorious than their own.  That’s not me.  There are many things about Japan for which I developed a deep and abiding appreciation.  I’m also objective enough to recognize the negative aspects of it’s culture.  On balance, however, I find it a fascinating and admirable country and I’m very thankful for the chance to have so thoroughly experienced all it had to offer.

Some of the aspects of the culture that I most appreciated and that affected me most fundamentally:  1) the sense of community and the importance of group identity, 2) the personal discipline so critical to fulfillment and success, 3) the expectation that respect, consideration and courtesy permeate all human relationships, 4) a commitment to a shared set of values that define both the person and the nation.  For a young man, still in the process of defining himself as a person and a professional, those are not the worst set of foundation stones upon which to build.  I can’t say that I was a perfect student but all left their mark as I learned to work with and relate to my Japanese colleagues and peers.

This book captures many of those elements and I appreciated both the refresher course and the memories it conjured up.  This is an older book – published in 2002 – based on a fictional country and culture modeled on that of medieval Japan.  It’s one I’ve always been aware of and interested in but never purchased or read.  I finally took the opportunity to do so this week and it was a pleasure.  The two protagonists – Shigeru and Takeo – are portrayed in such a way that they either embody or strive to reflect those values.  They’re juxtaposed against a set of antagonists – Noguchi and Iida – that exemplify some of the more negative aspects of the culture.  As with so many Japanese stories – or stories about or modeled after Japan – death is the defining experience.  The story makes it clear that death is preferable to the dishonor of a poorly lived life and how and when you choose to die or accept death is the ultimate measure of the individual.

The Author – Gillian Rubinstein – an Englishwoman who eventually moved to Australia and who wrote this series using the pseudonym Lian Hearn – definitely resisted the temptation to satisfy her readers with a typically American happy ending.  A whole host of characters that you come to respect and appreciate do not survive the story and those that do are forced to make tortured decisions regarding their future – denying or deferring love – refusing the opportunity to embrace power and fame.  Ultimately, that is what makes this story so interesting and so very Japanese.  Your choices define you and life makes no promise with respect to easy decisions or joyful outcomes.  The needs and desires of the individual are, by necessity, subjugated to the needs of the larger group or to the demands of dignity, duty and honor.  Happiness is not a goal worthy of pursuit if it asks the individual to violate a higher or greater set of obligations to family, society, justice or nature.

I would think that many who read the book will find it sad – I only see nobility of intent and purpose in the protagonists and that is one of those aspects of Japan which I often – not always but often – experienced and did come to truly and deeply appreciate.  I am very glad I finally read this one and it has me thinking about a return to Nihon after a 17 year absence.

The series is called “Tales Of The Otori” and it consists of three volumes – the second and third being:  1) “Grass For His Pillow” and “Brilliance Of The Moon”.  I would recommend them to anyone interested in considering a very different way of thinking about what we’re placed on this world to do or how we should live.

Posted in On The Nightstand | 9 Comments

On My Mind – Pulitzer Prizes – 4/17/2018

I didn’t want the day to go by without a quick note on something that I believe merits everyone’s attention.  The 2018 Pulitzer Prizes were announced yesterday at Columbia University’s School of Journalism.  The Prizes, meant to encourage excellence in the areas of Journalism and Letters, Drama and Music, were first awarded in 1917.   The full list of 2018 recipients can be accessed via the link below on the Pulitzer Organization’s website.

http://www.pulitzer.org/prize-winners-by-year/2018

To be completely transparent, I’ve always paid more attention to the Journalism awards – not so much the Letters, Drama & Music Awards – ironic for someone as passionate about reading as I am and not something I can explain.  I do like to review the Journalism Award Winners every year, however, and this year I felt it particularly important to do so.

In a year where the Free Press has been under relentless assault from so many questionable actors of all political persuasions, my request to everyone is that you carve out some measure of your reading time every day and actually spend it with a newspaper.  It’s my unshakable belief that if you rely on either the television or social media to get your “news” – you’re getting nothing at all.

I’ve stated in a past post that I find the 24 hour Cable news programs – all of them – to be travesties – delivering entertainment disguised as commentary.  They’re not completely fact free but if you limit yourself to only one of these stations – CNN, MSNBC or Fox – I can assure you that you’re not getting a balanced and unbiased version of domestic or world events.  I do not know how anyone could still have one iota of faith – after all we’ve come to know about the ability of malicious actors to disseminate inaccurate and / or inflammatory content – in social media as a source of reliable information.

I actually spend a fair amount of time trying to stay informed and , in my humble opinion, the only relatively reliable way to do so on a daily basis is to actually read several – not one – but several newspapers.  I subscribe to both the New York Times and the Washington Post and read them every morning before I head in to work.  On a daily basis, I also scan the articles pushed out through the websites for NPR, BBC News, CNBC and the Wall Street Journal.  Finally, I read the Economist on a weekly basis.  There’s enough diversity of thought across all those platforms that so that I feel fairly confident that I can make relatively informed decisions about what’s actually happening in the world.

I’m not looking for truth.  I’m looking for information – for fact based reporting – for data points that help me form opinions and make decisions.  I’ve become reasonably certain over the course of the last 56 years that this is the only way to get there and I’d encourage everyone to give it a try.  It helps.

For those of you who might be curious, here’s the text of the 1st Amendment:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

There’s a reason the Founders put this one first.  It’s meant to provide the most critical fail safe for our Democracy.  For the first time in my life – someone who’s always been a true and passionate believer in the principles upon which this country was founded – I worry about it’s durability.

Posted in On My Mind | Leave a comment

On The Screen – Pacific Rim: Uprising – 4/15/2018

I’m going to keep this one pretty brief – primarily because it doesn’t really deserve much thought.  Yes – I saw the movie – I see almost all Science Fiction / Fantasy related movie releases.  Yes – I enjoyed it – it was mindlessly entertaining.  No – it was not a good movie.  With the exception of John Boyega, the acting was mediocre at best.  The story was silly.  The ending was contrived.  Still – I had fun.

You have to place that in context – I think the first Pacific Rim represents one of those odd,  unexpected B Movie classics.  How they got Idris Elba to make that move, I don’t know – but if gave it a measure of respectability that it otherwise might not have had.  I’ve seen it 3 or 4 times and if I see it listed as a late night option on my cable service when I’m surfing, I’ll click on it and watch it again.

It was therefore inevitable that I’d see the movie.  Combine that with the fact that I’ve been a HUUUGE Kaiju – Godzilla / Rhodan / Mothra / Ghidorah / Gamera – fan since I was a very young kid and it was also inevitable that I’d have fun at the movie.

Given all that, my unemotional, educated, sophisticated me will admit that this is a dumb movie and it’s one that would be better seen you’re home alone at 12:05 AM Sunday morning after Saturday Night live but you’re just not ready to call it a night.  Yeesh – guilty pleasures. 😉

Posted in On The Screen | 2 Comments

On The Screen – Ready Player One – 4/15/2018

So…I’d always intended to see the move – I see most new Science Fiction / Fantasy movies and I love the fact that I have so many decent choices these days.  Having said that, I also always try to read the book before I see the movie adaptation.  I like to experience the Author’s vision before I’m overwhelmed by the interpretation of the Director and the various production companies – sifted through Marketing’s sense of what will sell.  I did read Ready Player One a few weeks ago and posted a review – which you can read here:

http://booksofbrian.com/on-the-nightstand-ready-player-one-2-9-2018/

The book has been positively reviewed – an average of 4.5 Stars from almost 17,000 reviews on Amazon.  I gave it a thumbs up as well – for reasons which are somewhat disconnected from the quality of the writing.  It definitely belongs in the Teen Fiction category – the MMORPG construct of The Oasis and the coming of age components will resonate with my childrens’ generation – but Ernest Cline very cleverly flooded the story with 80’s pop culture content that makes it fun for old guys like myself.  Ultimately, what I liked most about the book was its ability to serve as a pretty knowledgeable history of computer gaming and gaming culture.  You can see all that in my review.

Transitioning to the movie – which also did relatively well with the critics – 74% on the Tomatometer and 80% Audience Score – I have to say that I enjoyed it – but not nearly as much as the book.  It was a well made, fun movie – not a surprise given the fact that it’s a Spielberg project – and it faithfully captured all the Teen-oriented components of the book – the portrayal of The Oasis as a huge gaming environment, the teen love interest, the coming of age aspect.  The parts of the book that were shortchanged were the 80’s pop culture component – it was there but it just wasn’t as pervasive – and the great historical overview of the development of computer games and gaming culture.  It didn’t put me off on the movie – I found myself enjoying the 80s rock / pop sound track and I kept calling out all the 80’s game and pop culture images – but it just wasn’t woven into the bones of the movie narrative the same way Cline managed to do so with the book.

In Spielberg’s defense, if he’d wanted to preserve that aspect of the book, he would have had to commit to multiple episodes – you can’t contain all that in a 2 hour film – and that just wouldn’t have worked for viewers.

I also found the antagonists in the book – IOI, it’s management and it’s minions – a bit more forbidding and threatening in the book – in the movie, they were a little too cartoonish – but that’s defensible as well.

Overall, it was a fun film but given a choice between reading the book and seeing the movie – I’d go with the book every single time.

Posted in On The Screen | Leave a comment

On My Mind – 2018 Hugo Nominees – 4/14/2018

I posted a link to the Verge Article announcing the 2018 Nebula Nominees about a month ago so felt I should also get you the link to the Verge’s Hugo Nominees as well.  Thanks again to NG for getting it to me.

https://www.theverge.com/2018/3/31/17183718/2018-hugo-award-nominations-science-fiction-fantasy-books

The Hugos are the annual awards with the strongest name recognition – winners chosen by fans – but the Nebulas – chosen by The Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America (SFWA) – is generally considered to be a more prestigious award.

I haven’t done too badly this year when it comes to the nominated novels – having read 2 of 6 – “The Collapsing Empire” by John Scalzi – link to review below:

On The Nightstand – The Collapsing Empire – 1/8/2018

and “Raven Stratagem” by Yoon Ha Lee.  I’ll get back to this one shortly as I read it before I started writing these posts.

I’ve also read and reviewed “All Systems Red” from the Novella category by Martha Wells – link to review below:

http://booksofbrian.com/on-the-nightstand-all-systems-red-1-16-2018/

I thought that both “The Collapsing Empire” and “All Systems Red” were good books but I don’t know that I would have ever thought of either as Hugo worthy.  I found them to be kind of inconsequential.

“Raven Strategem” – as well as the first novel in this two book series – “Nine Fox Gambit” was a horse of a completely different color.  I found both of these to be spectacular books – so different – completely unique – truly like nothing I’ve ever read before.  It’s easy to trick yourself into believing, after reading extensively in this genre for about 45 years, that you’ll never run into anything new – that all of the really great stories have already been told or all of the really revolutionary concepts have been explored.  Then…along comes someone like Lee with his “Machineries of Empire” books and pretty much blows me away.  Ann Leckie did the same with her “Imperial Radch” series.

This isn’t meant to be a review of the book – just my call-out for a nominee that I feel is truly unique and very worthy.  Give these two a try – you won’t be sorry.

As for the other nominees, I have Ann Leckie’s Provenance but haven’t had the chance to read it yet.  Given how much I enjoyed her “Imperial Radch” series, it’s only a matter of time.  I haven’t purchased Mur Lafferty’s “Six Wakes” yet but it looks intriguing and I do plan to get to that one as well.  I’m probably not going to get around to Robinson’s “New York 2140” – given the policies being pursued by the current Administration, I kind of feel like I’ll have the opportunity to live the prologue to that novel.  That just leaves N.K. Jemison’s “The Stone Sky” and it’s  already a source of frustration for me.

I just missed this one – “The Broken Earth” trilogy – when the first book – “The Fifth Season” was released in 2015.  All three books in this trilogy – “The Stone Sky” being the third and final – have been extremely popular and very highly reviewed.  I hate that feeling of missing the boat – of not picking up a good series when it first comes out and letting it get ahead of you.  I know I’ll eventually read this book but I’m going to have to back track and read “The Fifth Season” and “The Obelisk Gate” first – and with my current backlog – I may be reviewing that one from assisted living.

All six – maybe five of six – look like really compelling reads.  I hope you’ve had the chance – or will take the opportunity – to give them a read.  I know I will.

Posted in On My Mind | Leave a comment

On The Nightstand – The Thousand Names – 4/14/2018

This one was unplanned.  I’d just finished my second April release – “The Night Dahlia” by R.S. Belcher – and I was honestly without direction on to what I was going to read next.  It’s not that I didn’t have plenty of choices – the Library’s full of them – I just didn’t have anything that was on its knees – begging to be read.  When I wind up in that situation, I sometimes just allow myself to be guided by chance.  I’ll sit in my chair in the Library:

and let my eyes wander – scan the room and see what I fasten on first.

That’s exactly what I did this week and I wound up landing on “The Thousand Names” by Django Wexler.  I’d bought this one at Barnes & Noble in 2013 when it first came out but had never gotten ’round to it.  Thankfully, my random selection turned out to be a pretty good one.

Once I jumped in, I found that I really didn’t want to put it down.  There were so many things Wexler did well in this story that I found myself regretting the need to leave for work every morning – I just wanted to read through to the end.  Here’s just a few of the things that made it fun.

First, he keeps it simple.  He obviously wrote this as the first volume in an extended narrative but he didn’t feel the need to hit me with too much up front.  In the same way that Weber started small in his Honor Harrington epic with “On Basilisk Station”, we start out in a small, insignificant corner of his world with characters who are, at the time, small insignificant people.  He gives you a simple yet compelling baseline story that allows you to get to know his protagonists when they’re still nobodies who, at the time, are playing small ball.  Marcus and Winter become that much more worthy to the reader because you get to see them at that point in time when they’re on a very slow boat to nowhere.  Their growth over the course of the story is more believable and compelling due to how they’re introduced and the minor ugliness they have to overcome during the first few chapters of the book.

Second, I actually love the fact that magic plays no part in the narrative until the final 100 pages or so.  The entire first book is devoted to a very conventional military campaign – something that really appealed to me.  While you’re introduced to Colonel Janus relatively early in the book and while there are hints that he’s arrived to assume command of the Colonials for reasons far more complex than putting down a local rebellion, almost the entire book focuses on just that – his work to rebuild the Colonials and the military campaign he conducts to destroy the rebel coalition.  It’s actually a very well written fictional military history.  Wexler gets this part right and serves up descriptions of a series of battles that are both exciting and feel factual.  While Janus is obviously a skilled tactician, he’s conventional and there’s nothing in his battles that ever strike me as silly or out of bounds.

In fact, it’s pretty obvious that he’s modeled Janus on Napoleon as a tactician and a battlefield commander.  He makes reference to this in the introduction and he calls out David G. Chandler’s “The Campaigns Of Napoleon” as one of his sources of inspiration:

This is THE definitive history of Napoleon and his military campaigns.  At almost 1,200 pages in hardcover, reading it is no small task but for anyone interested in the time and the man, I would strongly recommend it.  I can’t begin to tell you how much I learned by reading this book.

As you read through this first volume of the series, you see Napoleon in Janus – his emphasis on mobility, effective use of cavalry as screening elements, willingness to split his command and fight multiple, concurrent engagements, the decisive nature of artillery and a willingness to put smaller units at risk in order to isolate and defeat larger elements of an enemy army.  Combine this with pretty accurate descriptions of the hardware used by armies during the Napoleonic age as well as the way he makes you feel the random and terrifying nature of the battlefield experience and you have a great fictional military history.  If you like this stuff, you’ll love the novel just for the way he marches you through the campaign to defeat the rebels – the Redeemers – and place his King’s allied Prince back on the local throne.

Finally, once he does introduce the element of magic – as well as the larger political context  at home that explains Janus’ presence in this far corner of the world – he does it skillfully and in a pretty compelling way.  There’s only a taste of this in the last 100 pages of the book but the way Wexler brings it in – serving up just enough to make you want to learn more – he’s opened a huge door for his readers to walk through.  By the time you get to the final pages of the book, Janus has convinced Marcus and Winter – who have grown into pretty formidable characters over the course of pretty grueling military campaign – to ally themselves with him in the larger project he’s pursuing on behalf of King and Country.

It’s all very skillfully done and it makes for a great read.  Short to long – there’s a lot to like about this book and I enjoyed it enough so that I’ve already ordered Book Two – “The Shadow Throne” – which should be arriving next week.

I was actually amazed that this series, since I picked up the first volume in 2013, has grown to 5 main novels, one short story prequel and one novella.  Titles are listed below in reading order:

The Penitant Damned – prequel short story

The Thousand Names – Main Novel #1

The Shadow Throne – Main Novel #2

The Shadow Of Elysium – Supplemental Novella

The Price Of Valor – Main Novel #3

The Guns Of Empire – Main Novel #4

The Infernal Battalion – Main Novel #5

If “The Shadow Throne” is as good as “The Thousand Names”, I’ll be buying and reading all of these.

Posted in On The Nightstand | 8 Comments

On The Nightstand – The Night Dahlia – 4/8/2018

I’ve commented in several past posts on R.S. Belcher and his three series:  Golgotha (very good), Nightwise (good) and Brotherhood Of The Wheel (not good at all).  This is the second book in the Nightwise series and I downloaded it the day it was released.  I enjoyed the first in the series – “Nightwise” – very much and have been looking forward to this one.  It didn’t disappoint but it also didn’t do anything to change the way I feel about these three series.

I read a lot of books built on this relatively common formula – set in our day and age, assuming the existence of a supernatural counter-culture consisting of a range of powers – from puissant to pitiful – from relatively righteous to disgustingly dangerous – with the common, daylight world protected from it’s supernatural residents by either self-appointed or organizational guardians.

The Nightwise books and their protagonist – Laytham Ballard – represent a respectable addition to this sub-genre but in some ways, it may be one of the hardest to read.  The primary challenge lies in the nature of the protagonist – Laytham Ballard.  I know what Belcher is trying to do with this guy – he’s a tortured individual – thoroughly compromised spiritually – completely polluted physically.  He wants desperately to hold onto a tiny sliver of decency and humanity but carries around a list of past transgressions and violations of rules, relationships and personal discipline – that leave him with little faith in his ability to do so.  He has a lot of red in his ledger – similar to Black Widow – with very little of the personal and professional discipline he would need to see it expunged.

I really want to empathize with Ballard – find a way to like him – but he makes it almost impossible.  He’s incredibly powerful but thoroughly dissolute.  He picks appropriate causes and strives to achieve ethically acceptable outcomes but he repeatedly compromises principles and relationships along the way.  While he does achieve some very small measure of redemption by the end of this book, he does it at significant cost to one of his oldest and most loyal allies as well as the one true innocent in the book – the person whose well-being he’s charged with protecting – and who he ultimately betrays to save his own life. He may bring bad guys down but he’s a drunk, a drug addict, a user and a selfish jerk.  I just don’t know how anyone comes to like this guy and that – in my opinion – bodes ill for the long term success of the series.

I find myself enjoying those around Ballard – the supporting characters who repeatedly choose to help him – at great risk to themselves – far more that Ballard himself.  While this crew are motivated by their belief in the existence of a kernel of good within Ballard – a belief reinforced by the relative worthiness of Ballard’s objectives – he deals with them all in a disappointingly transactional manner.  This group displays a repeated willingness to sacrifice themselves on his behalf and he gives them very little reason to continue to want to do so.  I have to say that this structure has worked for the first two volumes but it’s going to wear thin if Ballard doesn’t evolve – if he doesn’t begin to re-establish at least some small degree of the faith in himself and a measure of commitment to those around him – get back to the relatively virtuous and noble young Ballard that Belcher gives us a very brief flashback glimpse of at one point in the book – the young kid who doesn’t smoke, who runs and who reads when he’s not serving The Nightwise in their effort to protect normal human society from supernatural predators.

When I hold these books up against two other similar series – The Dresden Files series, by Jim Butcher and The Sandman Slim series by Richard Kadrey – I feel like it falls somewhere in between.

Dresden has a rich life filled with friends who support him and who he, in most cases, has been able to protect – with a few notable exceptions, he’s always been fighting the good fight – he’s dealt with his demons and has a solid sense of self – he’s rational and represents a source of order in his world – he’s made mistakes and hurt people but it rarely shakes him and never breaks him.  Harry is a White Night – a protector and guardian – a bonafide good guy.  It’s easy to like him.

Sandman is an amoral, ruthless, uncaring killer who indulges any / every vice accessible to  him.  He is a source of chaos in a very unsteady world – an actor with the potential to send the whole thing spinning off it’s axis – he has friends and he cares for them but he is guided by pure, unadulterated self-interest and he makes it clear to those who choose to connect themselves to him that they do so at their own risk and that he can’t be held responsible for the consequences of those decisions – he’s a bit of a monster but he’s completely comfortable with who and what he is – he’s not tortured – he feels few, if any regrets – and he’s still weirdly likable.  He’s insanely funny and he stumbles through book after book somehow doing a reasonable amount of good – whether that was his original intention or not.

Ballard is something different altogether.  Where Harry is noble and Sandman is reprehensible and both are comfortable with their choices – Ballard is reprehensible but lives with regrets and struggles with choices he might have made.  While Harry has true friendships based on mutual affection and obligation and while Sandman has twisted relationships based respect and loyalty – Ballard has one way relationships that are all take and very little give.  Harry moves fast and saves people and you love him for being a hero.  Sandman moves fast and breaks things and you love him for being a crazy clown.  Ballard moves fast, he saves people, he breaks things and it’s almost hard to care for him one way or another.

Now, having said all that – this was still a good read and I’ll buy future installments.  As stated above, Ballard did find some very small measure of redemption by the end of the book and he seems poised to try and exorcise some of his demons – make a real effort to find his way back to a better version of himself.  I’m willing to see where Ballard takes this and whether he’s willing to make Ballard someone I want to invest in.  My fear is that Belcher might like Ballard too much the way he currently is and just may not be able to get me there.

One final note on both this series and on the Sandman Slim books.  I really wish both Authors would stop trying to impress me with their voluminous knowledge of popular music.  There are very few scenes in all of these books that don’t contain a reference to the song playing in the background.  Thanks.  You’ve impressed me.  Could you now please move on.  It doesn’t really add anything to the story.

Posted in On The Nightstand | 1 Comment

On The Screen – Altered Carbon – 4/7/2018

I mentioned this Netflix series – based on a book of the same name by Richard Morgan – in an earlier post.  I’d watched the first few episodes and had really enjoyed them.  I finished the final 3 episodes last night – full series consists of 10 episodes – and I wanted to post a quick follow up.

To begin with, I thought this was a brilliant book – disorienting – complex – compelling – definitely worth a reread or two.  I might even put it on my Top 100 List.  Unfortunately, many who feel that way about the book could find the series somewhat problematical due to its noticeable narrative departures.  That’s likely going to stick in the craw of many readers and may very well lead some them to just dismiss the series.

Not so for me and I hope others will choose not to take a purist approach!  I felt that this was superb television and Netflix deserves a lot of credit for bringing it to the small screen in such a compelling way.  The rich visuals – the quality of the acting – the way a very complex story grows and develops over the course of 10 one hour episodes – the willingness to explore some fairly disorienting concepts – all I can say is kudos to Netflix.  It was well enough done so that I was able to divorce myself from a book that I truly love and accept this version as an excellent adaptation.  In fact, a few of the deviations became some of the things I liked most about the Series – Poe, the AI personality of the Ravel Hotel – the importance of Kristen Ortega and her family – the addition of Lizzie.

One quick thought relevant to both the book and the series – there are many things going on in this story – many complex questions posed by the availability of the cortical stack technology and it’s impact on society and humanity.  The central issue around which most others revolve is summed up in Laurens Bancroft’s final line – the question “Have we lived too long?”  It’s an acknowledgement of the fact that the practical immortality which the Methuselahs (Meths) have achieved – while it provides them with the power of Gods vis-a-vis the average citizen – it does not free them from the frailties and weaknesses of their less fortunate fellows.  The freedom to act independent of consequences while alive and divorced from the potential for any judgement in the afterlife produces an over-class unsurprisingly devoid of any ethical, compassionate or noble element in their lives.

If there is a comparison that can be drawn to the current state of our society in this country, it would be posed by the question – “Have we become too wealthy?”  The concentration of wealth in the U.S. has the potential – may already have – produced an over-class that are similarly freed from the painful considerations of the majority of citizens and similarly free from most of the consequences of their actions.  The only constraint still existing for that small group of super-wealthy individuals – and it is a self-imposed constraint – is the potential for and fear of judgement in the afterlife.

If you haven’t read the book – I’d really encourage you to give the Series a try.  Despite the liberties Netflix has taken, I think the Series very effectively represents the novel – no small task given the complexity of the story being told.  For those who have read and loved the book, try to approach the Series with an open mind and accept it as a new version with some changes that you might eventually find yourself enjoying.  I think you’ll be glad you did.

Posted in On The Screen | Leave a comment